Share on facebook

Share on twitter

120 124 views | 13 Jul. 2017

Viewers like you help

Ef Ts

Unfortunately very very basic. It's good for kindergarden pupils, though. Thanks for wasting my time!

2299momo

7:13 the point (1/2 , 1/2) does not lie on a circle with radius 1/sqrt(pi) so it actually is impossible.

Michael K

can you do an episode on Mirzakhani? thanks. <3

antwan1357

The problem of this version of game theory they take out the skill and free will of the gamer.

Rob Bird

Kolmogorov is easily one of the top 3 mathematicians of all time.

Share on facebook

Share on twitter

1 942 views | 23 Jun. 2013

A logical construct for

The Human Podcast

currency was finally set up but I believe that a fiat burning situation would more likely lead to a bartering system that would take years to replace as it did in our history. The other simply is that $20 000 would be worth the same as $1200 dollars today... this would be again a extreme situation of hyperinflation and a “win” would be down to personal view point. That is all I have issue with. The video is of very high quality and I would love to have a bigger debate with you. As to rocky...

mkmstillstackin

you know you're well versed when you're able to cite 17th century logical arguments from Pascal. wow! I'm continuing to love your videos, belangp! It's like I said before, I have always felt concepts like these in my gut but haven't put forth, to this degree the explicit philosophical assertions, historical references, research, etc. to support them, as you do. another great mind exercise! thanks for sharing, belangp.

belangp

You're right that I'm using his philosophy and not his mathematics Rocky. The application of the logical framework is fine so long as one understands the different purpose and different underlying assumptions. Nowhere in the presentation did I ever state anything like "God IS, therefore buy metals" :) Flexibility of thought is critical because there are no textbook formulas or recipes that will ever lead to success in the important things in life.

belangp

No hard feelings Rocky. We all have our trials in life and deal with them the best we know how. I deeply respect the devotion you show to your mother.

B. White

ping ping ping ping!

Share on facebook

Share on twitter

1 419 262 views | 2 Nov. 2015

View full lesson:

Lobster13

I'm convinced this only appeared in my recommended because I have been working with Group Theory in Inorganic Chem -_- not a fan of it at all

Shawn Deer Williams

Pianists: I see this as an absolute win

ArvidPbGaming

Proud cuber and pianist here!

Christopher Sanders

This video was the most confusing TED-Ed video i have ever seen!

214 680 views | days ago

You should make a video on Bayes' Theorem. It is crucial for the understanding of the scientific method.

Your take on Gödel's incompleteness theorems would be interesting.

Why exactly must the chance you hit (x, y) with a dart be zero? If you were to integrate all the probabilities over the entire dartboard you'd get a total chance of hitting the board equal to 0, which is weird.

A paradox arises from requesting an infinitely small area from a granular universe.

Good darts players would be aiming for tipple 20 not bulls eye.

Probable, also means probe-able, testable, deterministic (which is generally taken as an antonym when meant totally), e.g. Can you probe a jar for cookies, depends on whether your hand fits its mouth, whether there are cookies in the jars, etc. This is mathematics: that statements are logical, and, arithmetical, and the consistency is left as homework...

My favourite aspect of probability is knowing how often I'll hit a straight or flush draw when the other players at the table have no clue

This channel always motivates me to study more math, sometimes school cant keep me interested enough, although I love math.

well, the probability that she reads this comment on such an old video is zero

It's weird that PBS has to put advertising here, it sucks. Damn republicans.

I have just come across your videos, and find them very informative. i wonder if you have ever done a video on what is sometimes called "The Monty Hall Game Show problem" Thanks for the excellent video.

The fundamental principle of probability is that as time goes by the probability does not change. If I have spun 5 heads in a row, we all shout that the next spin is 50/50, year 7 shout out. So why is it that when one studies those who are banned from casinos the common thread is 'missing outcomes'.

9:22 you just gave a depiction of how the cortex learns a skill (except it does have a lovely reversable characteristic too it)

Do you perhaps have another channel on which you post more stuff?

Please more videos like this!

understanding nntaleb's tweets and MOOCs

I completely missed this when it first appeared due to what I think was insanity. I'm not sure the insanity is over but I just wanted to say that I think there is a hidden secret in coin flipping. It might even be tied to universe being a simulation. But remember, I'm not sure the insanity is over.

Somewhat Ironic how they talk about probability on a channel called infinite series. After all probability and statistics don't really apply to infinite series

Kelsey, ,great episode, and thanks for pointing out the man-bun should be no more. Unless you're Toshiro Mifune!

Pascal is wrong. There's an opportunity cost in believing in God. You lose your freedom to dictate your own value and life direction. You'll be literally enslaved by a doctrine that's likely just a myth. The time and dedication needed to practice the religion will be forever gone. I see ZERO return on investment in this particular reasoning.

Bayes theorem

Imagine you choose a number from 0-1 and the number you choose is the probability of some number to be one suppose the first number is one what is the chance of the next one to be one

If there are an infinite amount of exact points on the board, why doesn't that mean the probability of hitting one is infinitesimally small but not 0? Cause with the other examples like 1/4 the area fits on the board 4 times, with 1/2 it fits twice, so I was like if it fits on the board infinite amount of times it'd be 1/infinity? I'm just a layman so forgive me if I'm being stupid

I don't understamd math at all but i'm trying to save something because final exams are this year

Craps is my favorite thing about probability!?

Well it's not rational to believe in God, since in most major religions, the greater sin than to not believe in God, is to believe in a false God, and since we can't know which God is the real God, its more rational to not believe at all in a God.

I suppose probabilities is basic to quantum computations.

so "Pascal's Wager" is basically the "it'd cost you exactly $0.00 to be kind" meme

I can't get over the idea that the probability of hit a point is Zero!!

Beautiful women. Thank you for being explaining maths!

I think of probability as a mathematical limit. Like, as the number of attempts N approaches infinity, the ratio of the number of times an event happens to N approaches the probability of the event occurring per attempt.

Probably not mathematically correct, but that's just the way it seems to me.

4:43 What about squares that are places in a city? Like a town's square or times square?

I (we) miss you

Can you do an episode on prime gaps?

why is the probability of hitting a point not "one over infinity"?

probability of a probability is that its a probability

I'm genuinely interested in morality and patterns of ethics and the probability of acceleration I guess? (and music)

Quantum mechanics

be there or be square came about because if you're not there you're not "a round". also it rhymes

OMG... are humans normally THAT white? never seen IRL

Love how, at 4:13 neither of the pictures shows Algebra or Geometry (Geometry that deals with constructions, that is)

if a 0% probability doesn't guarantee that it won't happen, does a 100% probability not guarantee that it will happen?

Hmm ? Of the tens of thousands of gods created by man... On which one of those shall I place my wager? Please advise!

I had no idea that probability has had so many rigors apply to it so relatively recently.

Continuous probability is a mathematical fantasy- useful for handling extremely short portions of possibility but really everything has a measure. A bad blind throwing dart player will not (if he hits the board at all) hit every point will equal probability (not that it really is the point of the exercise) depending on whether he is left/right handed and positioned relative to the board will introduce a consider bias to the placement of the darts- if LH then hitting more on the right and if below more on the higher part.

My favorite aspect is it's predictive power

Wow. Intelligence is so sexy.

Thank for all the good you do.

I would like to learn more about

1. linear algebra (matrix calculations, algorithms, egen values, egen vector and so on)

2. fft or discrete fft (way and how it works, how to preserve amplitudes and so on)

3. approximating curves with sums of sin functions (how to kompres images using sums of sin)

I know these are topics for engeners and I use some of them every day. But I only know them good enough to used dem. I want to have a better understanding of them. And I believe these are topics many people would benefit from know.

Have a nice day.

In the video after this, you mention probability paradoxes.

This is a compilation of my favorites: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-interesting-or-popular-probability-puzzles-in-which-the-intuition-is-contrary-to-the-solution/answer/Alon-Amit?srid=uB1Fo

Pascal’s Wager missed the obvious that he was not wagering on the existence of God, but rather the claims of an earthly institution threatening him with eternal torture for failure to accept their claims to Divinity. His loss is the loss is the waste of a human lifetime lived in fear to anyone making a large enough overbet coupled with the sociopathy to carry out horrific acts of violence like the Inquisition, Salem Witch Trials, etc.

“...I have hardly met a mathematician capable of reason.” — Plato

Philosophically, Descartes was an idiot, too.

When you start talking about the dart board and hitting a single point on that dart board: you need to properly define that point. If you expressly mean hitting exactly a 0-dimensional point and no other points around it, then that is impossible...but it's also somewhat redundant to mention.

If however, you mean that each point is infinitesimal in size (and this is typically what people do mean, as they are dividing the board into an infinite number of sections), and that the dart head is of a comparable size (i.e. also infinitesimal as already stated in the video), then the probability of hitting any specific point becomes the proportion of that point to the overall size of the board which is infinitesimal and clearly non-zero. Applying a real number field to this type of maths where you either take limits or involve certain types of infinities/infinitesimals is erroneous. Instead you should be applying a number field that includes these things as numbers (e.g. the surreal number field), which would lead to much less confusion over such things as inaccurate approximations are no longer used.

ET cetera. not ex etera

I think the sort of numbers that engineers and physicists use, with a "margin of error", and "significant digits", imply a 1-dimensional interval, at least on the marginal part.

The way that mathematicians use transcendental numbers, like "Real" decimals, seems analogous to the physics of wave-particle duality. A photon travels as a (higher dimensional) wave but interacts as a particle (at a 0-D point). Similarly a transcendental decimal transcends 0-dimensions and like a wave it can potentially intercept a range of points. Sure it may collapse to a single point, but this is a bit like the wave function collapsing. It's very interesting the way both of these examples cross dimensions, so to speak. It definitely serves a particular purpose in this way.

Let's talk about focal points!

Sorry.

The Riemann Hypothesis could be a great subject for here. Seen some great videos about it, think you can do it better ^^

As a physicist, I'm all for Solovay Model. Down with axiom of election! Just joking, of course.

I was looking for something with more history to be fair. Especially the axiomatic approach of Kolmogorov's vs the limit approach for probability, and early origins of what happened afterwards.

Did anyone else notice that the dice @6:10 are flawed? Opposite sides are supposed to add to 7 (1-6, 2-5, 3-4) but they have 5 and 6 opposite each other.

Pascal probably wasn't aware of the prisoners' dilemma in game theory when he thought about god.

I feel bad for the person who posed so happily to be called as "a boring and old fashioned person" XD

I think pseudo-random number generators are interesting too. Have people studied the probability of those generators actually producing "random" numbers?

rubbish explanation

More episodes on probability plz!

Phil Dunphy is not a square!

Pascal's Wage is so childish - his God is childish. "Believe and I will reward you" - and what exactly is this 'believe in God' thing? It's just a feeling that "I hope this foolish God will reward me for pretending that I gave a shit about him , while in fact all I care about is to get my reward". How can all this greedy rationalization can have any relation at all with God ?Strange that he couldn't see how naive his notion of God was. It's an interesting example of how one's greed and fear can make him hallucinate and believe that he is in some way 'religious' . Nope, it's all just childish self-deception. I guess he failed to see it because his mind was conditioned in such a way that he thought 'believe+god=reward' is some kind of axiom, or a truth. In my opinion all these three concepts are juvenile: 1) believing in something you don't know, 2) god - I don't even know what this word means or could mean. From others descriptions he must be some kind of person or entity which rewards you infinitely if you bribe him 3)getting rewarded by someone you just believe(you don't actually know) exists.. and for what? for believing, hhahahh.

Anyway, I still love this guy Pascal... I have much to learn from him. Great video!

Hmm. I think his rationalization could be better worded this way: it's worth investing your time and energy in discovering and obtaining Freedom/Truth , because if there is such a thing, then becoming it is worth any sacrifice, and if there is no such thing, then all you do will go waste anyway, death will take everything and you'll turn into nothing, so why bother at all? :)) .

If I told my parents to pick one number each of the subset : natural numbers, what is the probability of them picking any number x? lim h -> infinity p(x) = 2/h, but surely there must be a mistake in our mathematics here, we are missing the actual operation that my parents will indeed pick a number.

I may probably understand this in future :P

This video should be shown at the first class of every probability course ...

Can you do a video on Minimum Description Length?

"Saying something has zero probability does not imply it's impossible."

Mind. Blown.

(Oh, and you forgot "town square"!)

Im in love... (withh all respect) of you as well of the content in this channel and every pbs channel! Cheers from Mexico!

My favorite part of probability?

AdDiNG FrACtiOnS

I am really uncomfortable with the probability of hitting a point being 0. It seems like it should be an infinitesimally small value, not 0. Having a probability of zero DOES mean an event is impossible NOT improbable. If you disagree please do state the difference.

I've always thought probabillity isn't real. If we look at the darts example, we can (in theory) accurately calculate where a dart will hit if we take into consideration the relevent data (Player's strength, dart's direction and weight distribution, wind, coriolis effect, etc).

I do however find probability theory convenient for engineering.

Bayes Theorem is my favourite.

"Infinitesimally small" doesn't mean "exactly a point". A point doesn't have an size, whereas an infinitesimal area does.

What is the probability that Kelsey is wearing that wedding ring to diminish the probability of random internet math nerds proposing?

Can someone please suggest some nice books about probability and statistics for a physicist?. I tried with "Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics" (by Frederic Reif) but... I would like something more axiomatic, Reif just loves doing approximations :/

The dice at 1:10 are totally wrong. Opposite sides always have to add up to 7 in proper dice.

"saying something has probability 0, does not mean it's impossible"... yes it does; that is exactly what it means.

I concur with the claim that random variables are "coarse", though (9:55). With a little bit more work you could have defined a continuous bivariate distribution on the board that has the required measure and is as smooth as you like. Otherwise, great video! Keep up the great work!

Practically when you hit anywhere on dart board, you are simultaneously hitting a Planck area of points. So the probability of hitting any given point must be 1/(No. of plank Areas on the dart board) which is non zero. Just saying...

Since this video was about probability, and you mentioned that we want to make decisions rationally, I suggest doing a deeper exploration into this topic in a future video, and especially address Bayes' Theorem and Bayesian Reasoning.

In particular, the host, Kelsey, may enjoy reading E.T. Jaynes' book "Probability Theory: The Logic of Science", which develops a framework for Bayesian reasoning from the ground up. I'm currently watching a video lecture series 'reading course' of Jaynes' book, which helps lower the slope of the learning curve of the book. Search YouTube for 'Aubrey Clayton' or 'Probability Theory: The Logic of Science' to check it out. BTW: Jaynes, following R.T. Cox, develops the laws of probability

withoutaxioms, instead relying on an informal list of 'desiderata' which he formalizes in a general way, showing that Probability Theory is theonlyvalid mathematical way to reason about 'plausibility'. This is an interesting alternative to Kolmogorov, and does not rely on Measure Theory.Bro why omit the origin of probability?

The earliest known forms of probability and statistics were developed by Arab mathematicians studying cryptography between the 8th and 13th centuries.

Most miracles originated in Levant.

Wow, now I can understand more Monte Carlo.

Easy PROVE GOD EXISTS

A GREAT SPIRITUAL TEACHER WILLCOME.

He will CARRY

1) Buddha on his back. Buddha thought that you were to avoid those who impeded your progress. When he became to fat to walk. They left him for he impeded their progress.

2) Allah is a clot in his ankle, Muhammad was a leetch and his teachings were not written down till years later so they are not his.

3) Shiva' rides on his calf. The worship the cow but it's his calf the deity rides that is holy, not the cow.

4) Confucius hangs from his chin

5) Christianity is a boil on his ass

6) he will have SAP on his back from the cross he was crucified upon

7) he will have God's wrath upon his knee, but his wrath has heart.

8) he will have kinky on his two feet for he is Kin too the Key; or holy and worthy of religious veneration.

9) The baha faith is a noose around his neck. The snake charmer.

10) he will have a gold fouled anchor with 7 links symbolic of uniting the world as one nation under Seven Seas. Extending the rights of Americans to the World.

A nation born in a day.

11) he will have True North Compass about him. A moral compass for the World to follow. It was written he would have great compassion but it's a poor translation. He will have Compass about him.

ALL are leeches on the body of christ. If you follow one religious path you all follow them all for Jesus Carrie's them all upon his body as proof to his identity. A gift from god.

I give you my body. It is covered in what look like scars but they're spiritual markings plain as day just like a tattoo.

God says to warm you before you get ate. Consumed as devil's food for having hate in your heart. 7 8 9

And OU812.

Murderous math. Killing the Son of God and steeling his book and recovering it making him an icon of the very religion he refused to convert to.

Taken by murder. A crimson stain of a blue blood.

Greating people of earth, I'm BACK

Favorite? It has to be the Monty Hall problem! It even bugged Paul Erdos, who was incredulous until running a computer simulation...

I'm interested in the use of elementary probability to aid in rational decision making.

As you mentioned that a countable set of Infinitesimal small points have 0 probability(7:42) well that somehow made sense but when I gave it a thought and took it to the extreme I ended up confused with this question

If we added Infinitely many infinitesimal small points all over the board, it would have 0 area thus 0 probability! But!

It is really obvious that we could hit these points 100% of the time since there are infinite of them Everywhere On the Board..

Thx for your amazing Channel ^_^

Isn't the circle formed by many points? If so the some of all the points of an area should vê equal to it's area, so the some of the probability of multiplus points of an area should be equal to the probability of the dard being in some point of an area.

Like, we can say that a patch of 6 cookies is made of 1 cookie+ 1 +1+1+1+1, the somatory of the parts is equal to the total

OW! my brain....ok take a break come back OW! my friggen brain.

A next-door-neighbour subject is that of reasoning given only probabilities and events. That is, given that event A has happened, and a bunch of probabilities, what is the probability of event B?

Only 100% and 0% probability remains true after the event has occurred that means whatever number you calculate it either happens or not so it's 100 or 0. Now why is probability important ?

If i'm waiting for somone to arrive for an appointment how long do i wait after the agreed time before i cut my losses?

Etceterais pronounced eht-SED-er-uhh, not ex-SET-er-uhh.Correct pronunciation helps maximize the professionalism of your videos.